Home › Forums › Logical Invest Forum › Exploring Long-Short Strategies Using Paired Leveraged/Inverse ETFs
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 day, 23 hours ago by
Mark Vincent.
- AuthorPosts
- 12/16/2025 at 4:42 pm #88024
Mark Vincent
ParticipantHas anyone experimented with creating individual long-short strategies for various asset classes using paired leveraged and inverse ETFs, then combining them into a diversified multi-strategy portfolio?
With the proliferation of inverse (and often leveraged) ETFs across many asset classes, it’s now easier to implement synthetic long-short exposure without direct shorting. For example, a long-short Japanese Yen strategy can be constructed using YCL (ProShares Ultra Yen, +2x long USD/JPY inverse, i.e., bullish on Yen) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen, -2x). In backtests, this paired approach often delivers higher returns and better Sharpe ratios than holding either ETF alone, thanks to volatility harvesting and reduced directional risk.
In my testing, this long-short pairing improved performance across most asset classes I’ve tried, with the exceptions being Oil and S&P 500.Asset classes tested:
– Gold
– Treasuries
– S&P 500
– Magnificent 7 (MAG7) stocks
– Japanese Yen
– Euro
– Bitcoin
– OilNotes on specific cases:
The pure S&P 500 long-short pair underperformed in my tests.
A stronger alternative for equity exposure is incorporating uncorrelated, trend-following ETFs like DBMF (managed futures), CTA (CTA strategy), or RSST (leveraged risk parity/multi-strategy). However, these have shorter track records, so future performance is uncertain and may be impacted by changing market regimes.Overall insight:
Allocating across multiple such long-short pairs, and further combining them with uncorrelated strategies (e.g., managed futures or your own custom ones), tends to yield superior risk-adjusted returns—higher Sharpe ratios, lower drawdowns, and more consistent performance.
I’d love suggestions for additional asset class pairs or combinations you’ve found effective!Cheers,
Mark V. - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.