Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy

TotalReturn:

'Total return, when measuring performance, is the actual rate of return of an investment or a pool of investments over a given evaluation period. Total return includes interest, capital gains, dividends and distributions realized over a given period of time. Total return accounts for two categories of return: income including interest paid by fixed-income investments, distributions or dividends and capital appreciation, representing the change in the market price of an asset.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (70.4%) in the period of the last 5 years, the total return, or performance of 116.7% of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is greater, thus better.
• During the last 3 years, the total return, or increase in value is 38.1%, which is lower, thus worse than the value of 44% from the benchmark.

CAGR:

'The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is a useful measure of growth over multiple time periods. It can be thought of as the growth rate that gets you from the initial investment value to the ending investment value if you assume that the investment has been compounding over the time period.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (11.3%) in the period of the last 5 years, the annual return (CAGR) of 16.8% of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is larger, thus better.
• During the last 3 years, the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) is 11.4%, which is lower, thus worse than the value of 13% from the benchmark.

Volatility:

'Volatility is a rate at which the price of a security increases or decreases for a given set of returns. Volatility is measured by calculating the standard deviation of the annualized returns over a given period of time. It shows the range to which the price of a security may increase or decrease. Volatility measures the risk of a security. It is used in option pricing formula to gauge the fluctuations in the returns of the underlying assets. Volatility indicates the pricing behavior of the security and helps estimate the fluctuations that may happen in a short period of time.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (15.4%) in the period of the last 5 years, the historical 30 days volatility of 18.2% of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is larger, thus worse.
• During the last 3 years, the historical 30 days volatility is 18.6%, which is higher, thus worse than the value of 14.5% from the benchmark.

DownVol:

'Risk measures typically quantify the downside risk, whereas the standard deviation (an example of a deviation risk measure) measures both the upside and downside risk. Specifically, downside risk in our definition is the semi-deviation, that is the standard deviation of all negative returns.'

• The downside volatility over 5 years of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is 12.9%, which is greater, thus worse compared to the benchmark GLD (10.9%) in the same period.
• During the last 3 years, the downside risk is 13.7%, which is greater, thus worse than the value of 9.9% from the benchmark.

Sharpe:

'The Sharpe ratio was developed by Nobel laureate William F. Sharpe, and is used to help investors understand the return of an investment compared to its risk. The ratio is the average return earned in excess of the risk-free rate per unit of volatility or total risk. Subtracting the risk-free rate from the mean return allows an investor to better isolate the profits associated with risk-taking activities. One intuition of this calculation is that a portfolio engaging in 'zero risk' investments, such as the purchase of U.S. Treasury bills (for which the expected return is the risk-free rate), has a Sharpe ratio of exactly zero. Generally, the greater the value of the Sharpe ratio, the more attractive the risk-adjusted return.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (0.57) in the period of the last 5 years, the risk / return profile (Sharpe) of 0.78 of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is greater, thus better.
• Compared with GLD (0.72) in the period of the last 3 years, the Sharpe Ratio of 0.48 is smaller, thus worse.

Sortino:

'The Sortino ratio improves upon the Sharpe ratio by isolating downside volatility from total volatility by dividing excess return by the downside deviation. The Sortino ratio is a variation of the Sharpe ratio that differentiates harmful volatility from total overall volatility by using the asset's standard deviation of negative asset returns, called downside deviation. The Sortino ratio takes the asset's return and subtracts the risk-free rate, and then divides that amount by the asset's downside deviation. The ratio was named after Frank A. Sortino.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (0.81) in the period of the last 5 years, the downside risk / excess return profile of 1.11 of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is larger, thus better.
• During the last 3 years, the ratio of annual return and downside deviation is 0.65, which is lower, thus worse than the value of 1.06 from the benchmark.

Ulcer:

'The ulcer index is a stock market risk measure or technical analysis indicator devised by Peter Martin in 1987, and published by him and Byron McCann in their 1989 book The Investors Guide to Fidelity Funds. It's designed as a measure of volatility, but only volatility in the downward direction, i.e. the amount of drawdown or retracement occurring over a period. Other volatility measures like standard deviation treat up and down movement equally, but a trader doesn't mind upward movement, it's the downside that causes stress and stomach ulcers that the index's name suggests.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (9.79 ) in the period of the last 5 years, the Ulcer Index of 15 of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is greater, thus worse.
• Looking at Ulcer Index in of 19 in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively larger, thus worse in comparison to GLD (8.3 ).

MaxDD:

'A maximum drawdown is the maximum loss from a peak to a trough of a portfolio, before a new peak is attained. Maximum Drawdown is an indicator of downside risk over a specified time period. It can be used both as a stand-alone measure or as an input into other metrics such as 'Return over Maximum Drawdown' and the Calmar Ratio. Maximum Drawdown is expressed in percentage terms.'

• The maximum DrawDown over 5 years of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is -34.4 days, which is smaller, thus worse compared to the benchmark GLD (-22 days) in the same period.
• Compared with GLD (-21 days) in the period of the last 3 years, the maximum reduction from previous high of -34.4 days is lower, thus worse.

MaxDuration:

'The Maximum Drawdown Duration is an extension of the Maximum Drawdown. However, this metric does not explain the drawdown in dollars or percentages, rather in days, weeks, or months. It is the length of time the account was in the Max Drawdown. A Max Drawdown measures a retrenchment from when an equity curve reaches a new high. It’s the maximum an account lost during that retrenchment. This method is applied because a valley can’t be measured until a new high occurs. Once the new high is reached, the percentage change from the old high to the bottom of the largest trough is recorded.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (897 days) in the period of the last 5 years, the maximum days under water of 595 days of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is lower, thus better.
• During the last 3 years, the maximum days under water is 595 days, which is larger, thus worse than the value of 436 days from the benchmark.

AveDuration:

'The Average Drawdown Duration is an extension of the Maximum Drawdown. However, this metric does not explain the drawdown in dollars or percentages, rather in days, weeks, or months. The Avg Drawdown Duration is the average amount of time an investment has seen between peaks (equity highs), or in other terms the average of time under water of all drawdowns. So in contrast to the Maximum duration it does not measure only one drawdown event but calculates the average of all.'

• The average days below previous high over 5 years of Gold-USD Aggressive Sub-strategy is 218 days, which is lower, thus better compared to the benchmark GLD (346 days) in the same period.
• Looking at average days below previous high in of 249 days in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively higher, thus worse in comparison to GLD (142 days).