Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy

TotalReturn:

'The total return on a portfolio of investments takes into account not only the capital appreciation on the portfolio, but also the income received on the portfolio. The income typically consists of interest, dividends, and securities lending fees. This contrasts with the price return, which takes into account only the capital gain on an investment.'

• The total return over 5 years of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy is 106.1%, which is greater, thus better compared to the benchmark GLD (94.6%) in the same period.
• Looking at total return, or performance in of 55.6% in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively smaller, thus worse in comparison to GLD (59.5%).

CAGR:

'The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is a useful measure of growth over multiple time periods. It can be thought of as the growth rate that gets you from the initial investment value to the ending investment value if you assume that the investment has been compounding over the time period.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (14.3%) in the period of the last 5 years, the annual performance (CAGR) of 15.6% of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy is higher, thus better.
• Compared with GLD (17%) in the period of the last 3 years, the annual performance (CAGR) of 16% is smaller, thus worse.

Volatility:

'Volatility is a statistical measure of the dispersion of returns for a given security or market index. Volatility can either be measured by using the standard deviation or variance between returns from that same security or market index. Commonly, the higher the volatility, the riskier the security. In the securities markets, volatility is often associated with big swings in either direction. For example, when the stock market rises and falls more than one percent over a sustained period of time, it is called a 'volatile' market.'

• The volatility over 5 years of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy is 10.8%, which is lower, thus better compared to the benchmark GLD (14.8%) in the same period.
• Looking at historical 30 days volatility in of 11.2% in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively smaller, thus better in comparison to GLD (14.3%).

DownVol:

'The downside volatility is similar to the volatility, or standard deviation, but only takes losing/negative periods into account.'

• Looking at the downside deviation of 7.5% in the last 5 years of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy, we see it is relatively smaller, thus better in comparison to the benchmark GLD (10.4%)
• During the last 3 years, the downside deviation is 7.7%, which is smaller, thus better than the value of 9.6% from the benchmark.

Sharpe:

'The Sharpe ratio (also known as the Sharpe index, the Sharpe measure, and the reward-to-variability ratio) is a way to examine the performance of an investment by adjusting for its risk. The ratio measures the excess return (or risk premium) per unit of deviation in an investment asset or a trading strategy, typically referred to as risk, named after William F. Sharpe.'

• The risk / return profile (Sharpe) over 5 years of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy is 1.22, which is larger, thus better compared to the benchmark GLD (0.79) in the same period.
• Looking at Sharpe Ratio in of 1.21 in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively higher, thus better in comparison to GLD (1.01).

Sortino:

'The Sortino ratio improves upon the Sharpe ratio by isolating downside volatility from total volatility by dividing excess return by the downside deviation. The Sortino ratio is a variation of the Sharpe ratio that differentiates harmful volatility from total overall volatility by using the asset's standard deviation of negative asset returns, called downside deviation. The Sortino ratio takes the asset's return and subtracts the risk-free rate, and then divides that amount by the asset's downside deviation. The ratio was named after Frank A. Sortino.'

• The downside risk / excess return profile over 5 years of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy is 1.75, which is greater, thus better compared to the benchmark GLD (1.14) in the same period.
• Compared with GLD (1.51) in the period of the last 3 years, the excess return divided by the downside deviation of 1.76 is larger, thus better.

Ulcer:

'The ulcer index is a stock market risk measure or technical analysis indicator devised by Peter Martin in 1987, and published by him and Byron McCann in their 1989 book The Investors Guide to Fidelity Funds. It's designed as a measure of volatility, but only volatility in the downward direction, i.e. the amount of drawdown or retracement occurring over a period. Other volatility measures like standard deviation treat up and down movement equally, but a trader doesn't mind upward movement, it's the downside that causes stress and stomach ulcers that the index's name suggests.'

• Compared with the benchmark GLD (9.75 ) in the period of the last 5 years, the Ulcer Index of 5.92 of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy is lower, thus better.
• Looking at Downside risk index in of 6.52 in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively lower, thus better in comparison to GLD (6.66 ).

MaxDD:

'Maximum drawdown measures the loss in any losing period during a fund’s investment record. It is defined as the percent retrenchment from a fund’s peak value to the fund’s valley value. The drawdown is in effect from the time the fund’s retrenchment begins until a new fund high is reached. The maximum drawdown encompasses both the period from the fund’s peak to the fund’s valley (length), and the time from the fund’s valley to a new fund high (recovery). It measures the largest percentage drawdown that has occurred in any fund’s data record.'

• Looking at the maximum drop from peak to valley of -15.2 days in the last 5 years of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy, we see it is relatively higher, thus better in comparison to the benchmark GLD (-22 days)
• Looking at maximum drop from peak to valley in of -15.2 days in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively higher, thus better in comparison to GLD (-18.1 days).

MaxDuration:

'The Drawdown Duration is the length of any peak to peak period, or the time between new equity highs. The Max Drawdown Duration is the worst (the maximum/longest) amount of time an investment has seen between peaks (equity highs). Many assume Max DD Duration is the length of time between new highs during which the Max DD (magnitude) occurred. But that isn’t always the case. The Max DD duration is the longest time between peaks, period. So it could be the time when the program also had its biggest peak to valley loss (and usually is, because the program needs a long time to recover from the largest loss), but it doesn’t have to be'

• Looking at the maximum time in days below previous high water mark of 471 days in the last 5 years of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy, we see it is relatively smaller, thus better in comparison to the benchmark GLD (897 days)
• Compared with GLD (235 days) in the period of the last 3 years, the maximum days under water of 471 days is larger, thus worse.

AveDuration:

'The Drawdown Duration is the length of any peak to peak period, or the time between new equity highs. The Avg Drawdown Duration is the average amount of time an investment has seen between peaks (equity highs), or in other terms the average of time under water of all drawdowns. So in contrast to the Maximum duration it does not measure only one drawdown event but calculates the average of all.'

• The average time in days below previous high water mark over 5 years of Leveraged Gold-Currency Strategy is 142 days, which is lower, thus better compared to the benchmark GLD (349 days) in the same period.
• Compared with GLD (63 days) in the period of the last 3 years, the average time in days below previous high water mark of 169 days is greater, thus worse.