Dow 30 Strategy unhedged

TotalReturn:

'Total return, when measuring performance, is the actual rate of return of an investment or a pool of investments over a given evaluation period. Total return includes interest, capital gains, dividends and distributions realized over a given period of time. Total return accounts for two categories of return: income including interest paid by fixed-income investments, distributions or dividends and capital appreciation, representing the change in the market price of an asset.'

• Compared with the benchmark DIA (79.2%) in the period of the last 5 years, the total return of 101.9% of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is larger, thus better.
• During the last 3 years, the total return, or performance is 47.8%, which is lower, thus worse than the value of 56.3% from the benchmark.

CAGR:

'The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is a useful measure of growth over multiple time periods. It can be thought of as the growth rate that gets you from the initial investment value to the ending investment value if you assume that the investment has been compounding over the time period.'

• The annual performance (CAGR) over 5 years of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is 15.1%, which is larger, thus better compared to the benchmark DIA (12.4%) in the same period.
• During the last 3 years, the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) is 14%, which is lower, thus worse than the value of 16.2% from the benchmark.

Volatility:

'In finance, volatility (symbol σ) is the degree of variation of a trading price series over time as measured by the standard deviation of logarithmic returns. Historic volatility measures a time series of past market prices. Implied volatility looks forward in time, being derived from the market price of a market-traded derivative (in particular, an option). Commonly, the higher the volatility, the riskier the security.'

• The historical 30 days volatility over 5 years of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is 16.9%, which is greater, thus worse compared to the benchmark DIA (15%) in the same period.
• Compared with DIA (14.4%) in the period of the last 3 years, the volatility of 16.6% is larger, thus worse.

DownVol:

'Downside risk is the financial risk associated with losses. That is, it is the risk of the actual return being below the expected return, or the uncertainty about the magnitude of that difference. Risk measures typically quantify the downside risk, whereas the standard deviation (an example of a deviation risk measure) measures both the upside and downside risk. Specifically, downside risk in our definition is the semi-deviation, that is the standard deviation of all negative returns.'

• The downside risk over 5 years of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is 11.8%, which is larger, thus worse compared to the benchmark DIA (10.3%) in the same period.
• During the last 3 years, the downside deviation is 11.5%, which is greater, thus worse than the value of 9.4% from the benchmark.

Sharpe:

'The Sharpe ratio is the measure of risk-adjusted return of a financial portfolio. Sharpe ratio is a measure of excess portfolio return over the risk-free rate relative to its standard deviation. Normally, the 90-day Treasury bill rate is taken as the proxy for risk-free rate. A portfolio with a higher Sharpe ratio is considered superior relative to its peers. The measure was named after William F Sharpe, a Nobel laureate and professor of finance, emeritus at Stanford University.'

• The Sharpe Ratio over 5 years of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is 0.75, which is larger, thus better compared to the benchmark DIA (0.66) in the same period.
• Looking at ratio of return and volatility (Sharpe) in of 0.69 in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively smaller, thus worse in comparison to DIA (0.95).

Sortino:

'The Sortino ratio measures the risk-adjusted return of an investment asset, portfolio, or strategy. It is a modification of the Sharpe ratio but penalizes only those returns falling below a user-specified target or required rate of return, while the Sharpe ratio penalizes both upside and downside volatility equally. Though both ratios measure an investment's risk-adjusted return, they do so in significantly different ways that will frequently lead to differing conclusions as to the true nature of the investment's return-generating efficiency. The Sortino ratio is used as a way to compare the risk-adjusted performance of programs with differing risk and return profiles. In general, risk-adjusted returns seek to normalize the risk across programs and then see which has the higher return unit per risk.'

• Compared with the benchmark DIA (0.96) in the period of the last 5 years, the downside risk / excess return profile of 1.08 of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is greater, thus better.
• During the last 3 years, the excess return divided by the downside deviation is 1, which is smaller, thus worse than the value of 1.45 from the benchmark.

Ulcer:

'The Ulcer Index is a technical indicator that measures downside risk, in terms of both the depth and duration of price declines. The index increases in value as the price moves farther away from a recent high and falls as the price rises to new highs. The indicator is usually calculated over a 14-day period, with the Ulcer Index showing the percentage drawdown a trader can expect from the high over that period. The greater the value of the Ulcer Index, the longer it takes for a stock to get back to the former high.'

• The Downside risk index over 5 years of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is 7.07 , which is greater, thus worse compared to the benchmark DIA (5.95 ) in the same period.
• Looking at Downside risk index in of 6.03 in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively larger, thus worse in comparison to DIA (3.62 ).

MaxDD:

'Maximum drawdown measures the loss in any losing period during a fund’s investment record. It is defined as the percent retrenchment from a fund’s peak value to the fund’s valley value. The drawdown is in effect from the time the fund’s retrenchment begins until a new fund high is reached. The maximum drawdown encompasses both the period from the fund’s peak to the fund’s valley (length), and the time from the fund’s valley to a new fund high (recovery). It measures the largest percentage drawdown that has occurred in any fund’s data record.'

• Compared with the benchmark DIA (-20.8 days) in the period of the last 5 years, the maximum drop from peak to valley of -18.9 days of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is larger, thus better.
• Looking at maximum reduction from previous high in of -18.9 days in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively lower, thus worse in comparison to DIA (-16 days).

MaxDuration:

'The Maximum Drawdown Duration is an extension of the Maximum Drawdown. However, this metric does not explain the drawdown in dollars or percentages, rather in days, weeks, or months. It is the length of time the account was in the Max Drawdown. A Max Drawdown measures a retrenchment from when an equity curve reaches a new high. It’s the maximum an account lost during that retrenchment. This method is applied because a valley can’t be measured until a new high occurs. Once the new high is reached, the percentage change from the old high to the bottom of the largest trough is recorded.'

• Looking at the maximum days under water of 424 days in the last 5 years of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged, we see it is relatively smaller, thus better in comparison to the benchmark DIA (477 days)
• During the last 3 years, the maximum time in days below previous high water mark is 261 days, which is greater, thus worse than the value of 142 days from the benchmark.

AveDuration:

'The Average Drawdown Duration is an extension of the Maximum Drawdown. However, this metric does not explain the drawdown in dollars or percentages, rather in days, weeks, or months. The Avg Drawdown Duration is the average amount of time an investment has seen between peaks (equity highs), or in other terms the average of time under water of all drawdowns. So in contrast to the Maximum duration it does not measure only one drawdown event but calculates the average of all.'

• The average days below previous high over 5 years of Dow 30 Strategy unhedged is 100 days, which is lower, thus better compared to the benchmark DIA (116 days) in the same period.
• During the last 3 years, the average time in days below previous high water mark is 76 days, which is larger, thus worse than the value of 39 days from the benchmark.