World Top 4 Strategy

TotalReturn:

'The total return on a portfolio of investments takes into account not only the capital appreciation on the portfolio, but also the income received on the portfolio. The income typically consists of interest, dividends, and securities lending fees. This contrasts with the price return, which takes into account only the capital gain on an investment.'

• The total return over 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy is 87.7%, which is greater, thus better compared to the benchmark ACWI (71.6%) in the same period.
• Looking at total return, or performance in of 68.7% in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively smaller, thus worse in comparison to ACWI (76.7%).

CAGR:

'The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is a useful measure of growth over multiple time periods. It can be thought of as the growth rate that gets you from the initial investment value to the ending investment value if you assume that the investment has been compounding over the time period.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (11.4%) in the period of the last 5 years, the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.5% of World Top 4 Strategy is greater, thus better.
• During the last 3 years, the annual return (CAGR) is 19.1%, which is lower, thus worse than the value of 21% from the benchmark.

Volatility:

'Volatility is a rate at which the price of a security increases or decreases for a given set of returns. Volatility is measured by calculating the standard deviation of the annualized returns over a given period of time. It shows the range to which the price of a security may increase or decrease. Volatility measures the risk of a security. It is used in option pricing formula to gauge the fluctuations in the returns of the underlying assets. Volatility indicates the pricing behavior of the security and helps estimate the fluctuations that may happen in a short period of time.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (16%) in the period of the last 5 years, the volatility of 8.5% of World Top 4 Strategy is smaller, thus better.
• Compared with ACWI (14.3%) in the period of the last 3 years, the historical 30 days volatility of 9.7% is lower, thus better.

DownVol:

'Risk measures typically quantify the downside risk, whereas the standard deviation (an example of a deviation risk measure) measures both the upside and downside risk. Specifically, downside risk in our definition is the semi-deviation, that is the standard deviation of all negative returns.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (11%) in the period of the last 5 years, the downside deviation of 5.8% of World Top 4 Strategy is lower, thus better.
• Compared with ACWI (9.6%) in the period of the last 3 years, the downside risk of 6.6% is lower, thus better.

Sharpe:

'The Sharpe ratio is the measure of risk-adjusted return of a financial portfolio. Sharpe ratio is a measure of excess portfolio return over the risk-free rate relative to its standard deviation. Normally, the 90-day Treasury bill rate is taken as the proxy for risk-free rate. A portfolio with a higher Sharpe ratio is considered superior relative to its peers. The measure was named after William F Sharpe, a Nobel laureate and professor of finance, emeritus at Stanford University.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (0.56) in the period of the last 5 years, the Sharpe Ratio of 1.29 of World Top 4 Strategy is larger, thus better.
• Looking at ratio of return and volatility (Sharpe) in of 1.72 in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively greater, thus better in comparison to ACWI (1.29).

Sortino:

'The Sortino ratio, a variation of the Sharpe ratio only factors in the downside, or negative volatility, rather than the total volatility used in calculating the Sharpe ratio. The theory behind the Sortino variation is that upside volatility is a plus for the investment, and it, therefore, should not be included in the risk calculation. Therefore, the Sortino ratio takes upside volatility out of the equation and uses only the downside standard deviation in its calculation instead of the total standard deviation that is used in calculating the Sharpe ratio.'

• Looking at the ratio of annual return and downside deviation of 1.9 in the last 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy, we see it is relatively higher, thus better in comparison to the benchmark ACWI (0.81)
• During the last 3 years, the ratio of annual return and downside deviation is 2.51, which is greater, thus better than the value of 1.93 from the benchmark.

Ulcer:

'The ulcer index is a stock market risk measure or technical analysis indicator devised by Peter Martin in 1987, and published by him and Byron McCann in their 1989 book The Investors Guide to Fidelity Funds. It's designed as a measure of volatility, but only volatility in the downward direction, i.e. the amount of drawdown or retracement occurring over a period. Other volatility measures like standard deviation treat up and down movement equally, but a trader doesn't mind upward movement, it's the downside that causes stress and stomach ulcers that the index's name suggests.'

• Looking at the Downside risk index of 2.74 in the last 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy, we see it is relatively smaller, thus better in comparison to the benchmark ACWI (8.89 )
• During the last 3 years, the Ulcer Ratio is 2.43 , which is lower, thus better than the value of 3.21 from the benchmark.

MaxDD:

'A maximum drawdown is the maximum loss from a peak to a trough of a portfolio, before a new peak is attained. Maximum Drawdown is an indicator of downside risk over a specified time period. It can be used both as a stand-alone measure or as an input into other metrics such as 'Return over Maximum Drawdown' and the Calmar Ratio. Maximum Drawdown is expressed in percentage terms.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (-26.4 days) in the period of the last 5 years, the maximum reduction from previous high of -9.6 days of World Top 4 Strategy is higher, thus better.
• Looking at maximum drop from peak to valley in of -9.6 days in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively larger, thus better in comparison to ACWI (-16.5 days).

MaxDuration:

'The Drawdown Duration is the length of any peak to peak period, or the time between new equity highs. The Max Drawdown Duration is the worst (the maximum/longest) amount of time an investment has seen between peaks (equity highs). Many assume Max DD Duration is the length of time between new highs during which the Max DD (magnitude) occurred. But that isn’t always the case. The Max DD duration is the longest time between peaks, period. So it could be the time when the program also had its biggest peak to valley loss (and usually is, because the program needs a long time to recover from the largest loss), but it doesn’t have to be'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (516 days) in the period of the last 5 years, the maximum days under water of 247 days of World Top 4 Strategy is lower, thus better.
• Compared with ACWI (94 days) in the period of the last 3 years, the maximum time in days below previous high water mark of 102 days is larger, thus worse.

AveDuration:

'The Average Drawdown Duration is an extension of the Maximum Drawdown. However, this metric does not explain the drawdown in dollars or percentages, rather in days, weeks, or months. The Avg Drawdown Duration is the average amount of time an investment has seen between peaks (equity highs), or in other terms the average of time under water of all drawdowns. So in contrast to the Maximum duration it does not measure only one drawdown event but calculates the average of all.'

• The average time in days below previous high water mark over 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy is 45 days, which is smaller, thus better compared to the benchmark ACWI (128 days) in the same period.
• Compared with ACWI (17 days) in the period of the last 3 years, the average days below previous high of 23 days is higher, thus worse.