World Top 4 Strategy

TotalReturn:

'Total return is the amount of value an investor earns from a security over a specific period, typically one year, when all distributions are reinvested. Total return is expressed as a percentage of the amount invested. For example, a total return of 20% means the security increased by 20% of its original value due to a price increase, distribution of dividends (if a stock), coupons (if a bond) or capital gains (if a fund). Total return is a strong measure of an investment’s overall performance.'

• The total return over 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy is 113.5%, which is larger, thus better compared to the benchmark ACWI (87.5%) in the same period.
• During the last 3 years, the total return, or performance is 37.9%, which is smaller, thus worse than the value of 38.5% from the benchmark.

CAGR:

'Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is a business and investing specific term for the geometric progression ratio that provides a constant rate of return over the time period. CAGR is not an accounting term, but it is often used to describe some element of the business, for example revenue, units delivered, registered users, etc. CAGR dampens the effect of volatility of periodic returns that can render arithmetic means irrelevant. It is particularly useful to compare growth rates from various data sets of common domain such as revenue growth of companies in the same industry.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (13.4%) in the period of the last 5 years, the annual performance (CAGR) of 16.4% of World Top 4 Strategy is greater, thus better.
• Looking at annual performance (CAGR) in of 11.3% in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively lower, thus worse in comparison to ACWI (11.5%).

Volatility:

'Volatility is a statistical measure of the dispersion of returns for a given security or market index. Volatility can either be measured by using the standard deviation or variance between returns from that same security or market index. Commonly, the higher the volatility, the riskier the security. In the securities markets, volatility is often associated with big swings in either direction. For example, when the stock market rises and falls more than one percent over a sustained period of time, it is called a 'volatile' market.'

• Looking at the 30 days standard deviation of 7.9% in the last 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy, we see it is relatively smaller, thus better in comparison to the benchmark ACWI (16.7%)
• During the last 3 years, the 30 days standard deviation is 7.7%, which is lower, thus better than the value of 17% from the benchmark.

DownVol:

'Risk measures typically quantify the downside risk, whereas the standard deviation (an example of a deviation risk measure) measures both the upside and downside risk. Specifically, downside risk in our definition is the semi-deviation, that is the standard deviation of all negative returns.'

• The downside volatility over 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy is 5.2%, which is lower, thus better compared to the benchmark ACWI (11.6%) in the same period.
• During the last 3 years, the downside risk is 5.1%, which is smaller, thus better than the value of 11.6% from the benchmark.

Sharpe:

'The Sharpe ratio (also known as the Sharpe index, the Sharpe measure, and the reward-to-variability ratio) is a way to examine the performance of an investment by adjusting for its risk. The ratio measures the excess return (or risk premium) per unit of deviation in an investment asset or a trading strategy, typically referred to as risk, named after William F. Sharpe.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (0.65) in the period of the last 5 years, the risk / return profile (Sharpe) of 1.77 of World Top 4 Strategy is larger, thus better.
• Compared with ACWI (0.53) in the period of the last 3 years, the risk / return profile (Sharpe) of 1.15 is higher, thus better.

Sortino:

'The Sortino ratio, a variation of the Sharpe ratio only factors in the downside, or negative volatility, rather than the total volatility used in calculating the Sharpe ratio. The theory behind the Sortino variation is that upside volatility is a plus for the investment, and it, therefore, should not be included in the risk calculation. Therefore, the Sortino ratio takes upside volatility out of the equation and uses only the downside standard deviation in its calculation instead of the total standard deviation that is used in calculating the Sharpe ratio.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (0.94) in the period of the last 5 years, the downside risk / excess return profile of 2.66 of World Top 4 Strategy is higher, thus better.
• Looking at ratio of annual return and downside deviation in of 1.72 in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively higher, thus better in comparison to ACWI (0.78).

Ulcer:

'The ulcer index is a stock market risk measure or technical analysis indicator devised by Peter Martin in 1987, and published by him and Byron McCann in their 1989 book The Investors Guide to Fidelity Funds. It's designed as a measure of volatility, but only volatility in the downward direction, i.e. the amount of drawdown or retracement occurring over a period. Other volatility measures like standard deviation treat up and down movement equally, but a trader doesn't mind upward movement, it's the downside that causes stress and stomach ulcers that the index's name suggests.'

• Looking at the Ulcer Index of 2.47 in the last 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy, we see it is relatively smaller, thus better in comparison to the benchmark ACWI (8.9 )
• Compared with ACWI (5.01 ) in the period of the last 3 years, the Ulcer Ratio of 2.35 is lower, thus better.

MaxDD:

'Maximum drawdown is defined as the peak-to-trough decline of an investment during a specific period. It is usually quoted as a percentage of the peak value. The maximum drawdown can be calculated based on absolute returns, in order to identify strategies that suffer less during market downturns, such as low-volatility strategies. However, the maximum drawdown can also be calculated based on returns relative to a benchmark index, for identifying strategies that show steady outperformance over time.'

• The maximum DrawDown over 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy is -8.2 days, which is higher, thus better compared to the benchmark ACWI (-26.4 days) in the same period.
• Looking at maximum DrawDown in of -6.6 days in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively greater, thus better in comparison to ACWI (-16.5 days).

MaxDuration:

'The Maximum Drawdown Duration is an extension of the Maximum Drawdown. However, this metric does not explain the drawdown in dollars or percentages, rather in days, weeks, or months. It is the length of time the account was in the Max Drawdown. A Max Drawdown measures a retrenchment from when an equity curve reaches a new high. It’s the maximum an account lost during that retrenchment. This method is applied because a valley can’t be measured until a new high occurs. Once the new high is reached, the percentage change from the old high to the bottom of the largest trough is recorded.'

• Looking at the maximum time in days below previous high water mark of 247 days in the last 5 years of World Top 4 Strategy, we see it is relatively smaller, thus better in comparison to the benchmark ACWI (516 days)
• Looking at maximum time in days below previous high water mark in of 207 days in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively higher, thus worse in comparison to ACWI (115 days).

AveDuration:

'The Drawdown Duration is the length of any peak to peak period, or the time between new equity highs. The Avg Drawdown Duration is the average amount of time an investment has seen between peaks (equity highs), or in other terms the average of time under water of all drawdowns. So in contrast to the Maximum duration it does not measure only one drawdown event but calculates the average of all.'

• Compared with the benchmark ACWI (128 days) in the period of the last 5 years, the average time in days below previous high water mark of 46 days of World Top 4 Strategy is lower, thus better.
• Looking at average days below previous high in of 51 days in the period of the last 3 years, we see it is relatively larger, thus worse in comparison to ACWI (28 days).